Tableratings

I ran pretty poorly this weekend, but still shipped some winnings + rakeback. Managed to play the volume I was shooting for to maintain pace for my last milestone bonus of the year. Hopefully I'll remember to post a few HHs from the weekend tomorrow.

On a more interesting note, Tableratings.com has recently added Pokerstars support, with an initial database containing hands over the last ~2.5 months, for hands at 100NL and above. The stats they have for me seem eerily accurate, though I've heard some reports from others that their's are off, though they could just be FPP pros trying to save face on 2+2.

You can check out their list of the winningest 100NL regs here:
http://www.tableratings.com/topwinners.php?site=6&structure=1&stakes=1&timeframe=year

Yup, that's me at #4! Here is my player specific breakdown:
http://www.tableratings.com/overview/Ronfar3?site=stars

Once again it surprises me how many regulars are rakeback pros or worse, along with how many are satisfied grinding out their <1ptBB/100 winrate. Often when I'm playing, I start thinking in my head that players who would typically be regarded as "decent" regs are pretty bad, then usually catch myself and note that I'm probably just being a jackass because I don't like them. Perhaps most of those folks are pretty bad...